Blake Lively is seeking a protective order against Justin Baldoni’s legal team regarding the Wayfarer Parties’ “continuing demands” for her communications with Taylor Swift.

According to the letter, obtained by PEOPLE, Baldoni’s team “have pursed [these communications] at the same time they have refused to produce to Ms. Lively the documents they publicly claimed to have received as part of a deal to withdraw their subpoenas to Ms. Swift and her counsel.” The letter is addressed to just Lewis J. Liman, from

Per Lively’s attorney Esra Hudson’s letter, “Good cause exists for this request because it has been” a “tactic” of Baldoni’s Wayfarer Parties “to make Ms. Swift and her fan base central to their media strategy against Ms. Lively.”

As a result of the above, Lively, 37, “respectfully requests that she be relieved from producing documents responsive to” related requests from Baldoni’s team, per the letter.

An attorney for Baldoni, 41, did not immediately respond to PEOPLE’s request for comment on Friday, June 13.

Swift, 35, was previously roped into the Lively v. Wayfarer Studios et al. case, but Baldoni dropped his document subpoena issued to the pop star last month, as mentioned in Hudson’s new letter submitted to the court on Friday.

Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE’s free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human-interest stories.

A spokesperson for Lively tells PEOPLE, “Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer parties are still demanding access to Taylor Swift’s private communications — despite having already subpoenaed and then withdrawn that subpoena after they ‘got all they needed.’ As reflected in today’s filing, their intent to drag Taylor Swift into this was evident as far back as August 2024, when the crisis PR firm led by Melissa Nathan included her in their ‘Scenario Planning’ document (Lively Amended Complaint, Exhibit D) and flagged the ‘TS fanbase’ as something to take ‘extremely seriously’ (Lively Amended Complaint, ¶214(b)). The ongoing attempts to once again try and use the world’s biggest star as a PR tactic in this matter reflects a public unraveling of epic proportions — and serves only to distract from the fact that Justin Baldoni’s lawsuits against Ms. Lively, Ryan Reynolds, their publicist, and the New York Times have been entirely dismissed.”

The letter comes after it was previously reported that Lively would subpoena Scooter Braun and HYBE, Braun’s K-Pop corporation, on Thursday, June 12. As first reported by Deadline, a notice of the upcoming move was sent to HYBE on Tuesday, June 10.

Per the outlet, the subpoenas will seek documents regarding crisis PR manager Melissa Nathan — who was previously named as a co-defendant in Lively’s ongoing case against Baldoni — and the work Nathan did for the It Ends with Us actor-director.

Braun, 43, has notably long been embroiled in legal battles with Lively’s friend Swift regarding the latter’s music masters, which she just regained control of in late May.

Meanwhile, news of the Another Simple Favor actress’s move against Braun came two days after Judge Liman dismissed the $400 million countersuit that Baldoni previously filed against Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds, their publicist Leslie Sloane and The New York Times.

Lively’s lawyers Hudson and Mike Gottlieb called the decision a “total victory and a complete vindication” for her and the others whom “Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties dragged into their retaliatory lawsuit.”

The PEOPLE App is now available in the Apple App Store! Download it now for the most binge-worthy celeb content, exclusive video clips, astrology updates and more!

In a statement obtained by PEOPLE Tuesday, Baldoni’s attorney Bryan Freedman said Lively and her team’s “predictable declaration of victory is false.”

He also said in an interview on TMZ Live that same day that he believes Judge Liman’s decision is “not fair” or “right.”

“I think that [Justin is] a person who wants to be vindicated, and that’s all that he cares about,” the lawyer continued, in part. “He knows who he is. He knows what he’s done. He knows what he hasn’t done. And he wants the truth to come out, and he wants to do that in the appropriate way. … He’s waiting for his day in court, where he can speak out to tell the truth.”